A needle in a haystack. Only 0.78% of launches raise a Series A. Our best model achieves 4.7× lift over random on the held-out test set.
| #▴ | MODEL | ORGANIZATION | METHOD | F0.5 | AP | REC | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Top-3 Ensemble🏆 | AUTHOR | ★0.284 | 0.126 | 0.080 | 0.840 | |
| 02 | ENS_avg🥈 | AUTHOR | ★0.271 | 0.094 | 0.080 | 0.836 | |
| 03 | LGBM FS3 + ISO🥉 | AUTHOR | ★0.247 | 0.066 | 0.080 | 0.793 | |
| 04 | XGB FS4 + ISO | AUTHOR | ★0.237 | 0.074 | 0.100 | 0.845 | |
| 05 | XGB FS4 | AUTHOR | ★0.223 | 0.070 | 0.100 | 0.829 | |
| 06 | Gemini 3 Flash | ★0.129 | 0.034 | 0.060 | 0.713 | ||
| 07 | LR FS4🏁BASELINE | AUTHOR | 0.127 | 0.047 | 0.060 | 0.825 | |
| 08 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | 0.067 | 0.022 | 0.060 | 0.697 | ||
| 09 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | 0.057 | 0.023 | 0.050 | 0.725 |
Top-3 products on launch day raise Series A at 3.5× the base rate. rank_bucket captures this non-linearly — moving from #4 to #1 adds more lift than #10 to #4.
We built PHBench the way we'd want to be evaluated. Every label is manually audited. Every feature is documented. Every submission reruns on a hash-pinned test set.
The test set phbench_public_test.csv is held out until final submission.